Processing math: 0%

Monday, December 19, 2011

Mathematical Reflections 2011, Issue 5 - Problem J205

Problem:
Find the greatest n-digit number a_1a_2\ldots a_n with the following properties:
i) all its digits are different from zero and distinct;
ii) for each k = 2,\ldots,n-1, \dfrac{1}{a_{k-1}}, \dfrac{1}{a_k},\dfrac{1}{a_{k+1}} is either an arithmetic sequence or a geometric sequence.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
The two properties imply that 1 \leq n \leq 9, 1 \leq a_k \leq 9, a_i \neq a_j if i \neq j and
\textrm{(i) } a_k(a_{k-1}+a_{k+1})=2a_{k-1}a_{k+1} \qquad \textrm{or} \qquad \textrm{(ii) } a_{k-1}a_{k+1}=a^2_k.
for each k=2,\ldots,8. We study each case separately.

(i) (a) a_k=2,4,6,8. We obtain the four equations
\begin{equation}\label{first} a_{k+1}=a_{k-1}(a_{k+1}-1) \end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{second} 2a_{k+1}=a_{k-1}(a_{k+1}-2) \end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{third} 3a_{k+1}=a_{k-1}(a_{k+1}-3) \end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{fourth} 4a_{k+1}=a_{k-1}(a_{k+1}-4) \end{equation}
The first has no solutions since a_{k+1}-1 can't divide a_{k+1}.
The second implies that a_{k+1}-2 divides 2a_{k+1} and since 2a_{k+1}=2(a_{k+1}-2)+4, a_{k+1}-2 must divide 4, i.e. a_{k+1}=3,6 and by symmetry a_{k-1}=6,3 respectively.
The third implies that a_{k+1}-3 divides 3a_{k+1} and since 3a_{k+1}=3(a_{k+1}-3)+9, a_{k+1}-3 must divide 9, so a_{k+1}=4,6 and a_{k-1}=12,6 respectively, so there are no solutions.
The fourth implies that a_{k+1}-4 divides 4a_{k+1} and since 4a_{k+1}=4(a_{k+1}-4)+16, a_{k+1}-4 must divide 16, so a_{k+1}=5,6,8 and a_{k-1}=20,12,8 respectively, so there are no solutions.

(b) a_{k-1}+a_{k+1}=8,10,12. (we can immediately discard a_{k-1}+a_{k+1}=4,6,14,16 because for any a_{k-1},a_{k+1} the LHS would be divisible by 3, by 4 or by 7 and the RHS not). We obtain
\begin{equation}\label{fifth} a_{k-1}+a_{k+1}=8, \qquad 4a_k=a_{k-1}a_{k+1} \end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{sixth} a_{k-1}+a_{k+1}=10, \qquad 5a_k=a_{k-1}a_{k+1} \end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{seventh} a_{k-1}+a_{k+1}=12, \qquad 6a_k=a_{k-1}a_{k+1} \end{equation}
The fifth implies that a_{k-1}=6,2 and by symmetry a_{k+1}=2,6 respectively, so a_k=3.
The sixth has no solutions since the LHS of the second equation is divisible by 5 and the RHS not.
The seventh has no solutions since the LHS of the second equation is divisible by 6 and the RHS not.

(ii) Since a_{k-1} \neq a_{k+1}, it is easy to see that the only solutions are
a_k=2, \qquad a_{k-1}=1,4, \qquad a_{k+1}=4,1
a_k=3, \qquad a_{k-1}=1,9, \qquad a_{k+1}=9,1
a_k=4, \qquad a_{k-1}=2,8, \qquad a_{k+1}=8,2
a_k=6, \qquad a_{k-1}=4,9, \qquad a_{k+1}=9,4.

In conclusion, we have the strings a_{k-1}a_k a_{k+1}=\{643,346,632,236,124,421,139,931,248,842,469,964\}.
Juxtaposing the strings, we see that the greatest number we can construct is 9643.

No comments:

Post a Comment