Processing math: 1%

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 5 - Problem S281

Problem:
Let f(n) be the sum of the digits of n^2 + 1. Define the sequence (a_n)_{n \geq 0}, with a_0 an
arbitrary positive integer and a_{n+1} = f(a_n), n \geq 0. Prove that (a_n)_{n \geq 0} is 3-periodic.

Proposed by Roberto Bosch Cabrera.

Solution:
Since f(5)=8, f(8)=11 and f(11)=5, it suffices to prove that for every positive integer a_0 there exists some n \in \mathbb{N} such that a_n \in \{5,8,11\}. Let m be the number of digits of a_0. We prove the statement by induction on m. For m \leq 2 we proceed by a direct check. If a_0 \in \{5,8,11\} there is nothing to prove. If a_0 is a two-digit number, then a^2_0 \leq 10000, so a_1 \leq 37 and we reduce to analyze the cases for a_0 \leq 37.

(i) If a_0 \in \{2,7,20\}, then a_1=5. If a_0 \in \{1,10,26,28\}, then a_1 \in \{2,20\}, so a_2=5. Finally, if a_0 \in \{3,6,9,12,15,18,27,30,33\}, then a_3=5.

(ii) If a_0 \in \{4,13,23,32\}, then a_1=8.

(iii) If a_0 \in \{17,19,21,35,37\}, then a_1=11. If a_0 \in \{14,22,24,31,36\}, then a_1 \in \{17,19\}, so a_2=11. Finally, if a_0 \in \{16,25,29,34\}, then a_3=11.

Thus, we have proved that if a_0 is a one or two-digit number, then a_n \in \{5,8,11\} for some n \in \mathbb{N}, i.e. the sequence is 3-periodic. Let m \geq 2 and suppose that the statement is true for all k \leq m. Let a_0 be an (m+1)-digit number. Then, 10^m \leq a_0 < 10^{m+1} which implies 10^{2m} \leq a^2_0 < 10^{2(m+1)}. Hence, a_1=f(a_0) \leq 9\cdot2(m+1)+1<10^m, and by induction hypothesis, the sequence (a_n)_{n \geq 1} is 3-periodic, which implies that the sequence (a_n)_{n \geq 0} is 3-periodic, as we wanted to prove.


Note: the problem was later changed.

No comments:

Post a Comment