Loading [MathJax]/extensions/TeX/mathchoice.js

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 5 - Problem U278

Problem:
Evaluate \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=0}^\infty \dfrac{1}{(kn+1)k!}.

Proposed by Dorin Andrica.

Solution:
Observe that for any n,k \geq 1, it holds n+1 \leq kn+1 \leq n(k+1). Therefore,
1+\sum_{k=1}^\infty \dfrac{1}{n(k+1)!} \leq \sum_{k=0}^\infty \dfrac{1}{(kn+1)k!} \leq 1+\sum_{k=1}^\infty \dfrac{1}{(n+1)k!}, i.e. 1+\dfrac{e-2}{n} \leq \sum_{k=0}^\infty \dfrac{1}{(kn+1)k!} \leq 1+\dfrac{e-1}{n+1}.
By the Squeeze Theorem, we have
1 \leq \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=0}^\infty \dfrac{1}{(kn+1)k!} \leq 1, hence \displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=0}^\infty \dfrac{1}{(kn+1)k!}=1.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 5 - Problem U277

Problem:
For n \in \mathbb{N}, n \geq 2, find the greatest integer less than 2(e^{\frac{1}{n+1}}+\ldots+e^{\frac{1}{n+n}}).

Proposed by Marius Cavachi.

Solution:
We claim that the greatest integer less than 2(e^{\frac{1}{n+1}}+\ldots+e^{\frac{1}{n+n}}) is 2n+1. Indeed,
2(e^{\frac{1}{n+1}}+\ldots+e^{\frac{1}{n+n}}) \geq 2ne^{\frac{1}{2n}} \geq 2n\left(1+\dfrac{1}{2n}\right)=2n+1,
but 2(e^{\frac{1}{n+1}}+\ldots+e^{\frac{1}{n+n}}) \leq 2ne^{\frac{1}{n+1}} < 2n+2,
where the last inequality can be obtained observing that \dfrac{1}{n+1}=\int_{1}^{1+\frac{1}{n}} \dfrac{1}{1+\frac{1}{n}} \ dx <\int_{1}^{1+\frac{1}{n}} \dfrac{1}{x} \ dx=\log\left(1+\dfrac{1}{n}\right).

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 5 - Problem S281

Problem:
Let f(n) be the sum of the digits of n^2 + 1. Define the sequence (a_n)_{n \geq 0}, with a_0 an
arbitrary positive integer and a_{n+1} = f(a_n), n \geq 0. Prove that (a_n)_{n \geq 0} is 3-periodic.

Proposed by Roberto Bosch Cabrera.

Solution:
Since f(5)=8, f(8)=11 and f(11)=5, it suffices to prove that for every positive integer a_0 there exists some n \in \mathbb{N} such that a_n \in \{5,8,11\}. Let m be the number of digits of a_0. We prove the statement by induction on m. For m \leq 2 we proceed by a direct check. If a_0 \in \{5,8,11\} there is nothing to prove. If a_0 is a two-digit number, then a^2_0 \leq 10000, so a_1 \leq 37 and we reduce to analyze the cases for a_0 \leq 37.

(i) If a_0 \in \{2,7,20\}, then a_1=5. If a_0 \in \{1,10,26,28\}, then a_1 \in \{2,20\}, so a_2=5. Finally, if a_0 \in \{3,6,9,12,15,18,27,30,33\}, then a_3=5.

(ii) If a_0 \in \{4,13,23,32\}, then a_1=8.

(iii) If a_0 \in \{17,19,21,35,37\}, then a_1=11. If a_0 \in \{14,22,24,31,36\}, then a_1 \in \{17,19\}, so a_2=11. Finally, if a_0 \in \{16,25,29,34\}, then a_3=11.

Thus, we have proved that if a_0 is a one or two-digit number, then a_n \in \{5,8,11\} for some n \in \mathbb{N}, i.e. the sequence is 3-periodic. Let m \geq 2 and suppose that the statement is true for all k \leq m. Let a_0 be an (m+1)-digit number. Then, 10^m \leq a_0 < 10^{m+1} which implies 10^{2m} \leq a^2_0 < 10^{2(m+1)}. Hence, a_1=f(a_0) \leq 9\cdot2(m+1)+1<10^m, and by induction hypothesis, the sequence (a_n)_{n \geq 1} is 3-periodic, which implies that the sequence (a_n)_{n \geq 0} is 3-periodic, as we wanted to prove.


Note: the problem was later changed.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 5 - Problem S279

Problem:
Solve in integers the equation (2x+y)(2y+x)=9\min(x,y).

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
Assume without loss of generality that x \leq y. Then, we have to find the integer solutions of the equation
2y^2+5xy+(2x^2-9x)=0. To this aim, the discriminant of this equation in y must be a perfect square, so there exists t \in \mathbb{Z} such that
\Delta_y=9x(x+8)=t^2 \implies x(x+8)-\dfrac{t^2}{9}=0, i.e. \left(x+4-\dfrac{t}{3}\right)\left(x+4+\dfrac{t}{3}\right)=16.
If both the two factors are equal to \pm 4, it must be t=0, so x=0 or x=-8, which give y=0 and y=10 respectively. If the two factors are distinct, since they have the same parity, it must be \begin{array}{lll}x+4-t/3&=&\pm 2 \\ x+4+t/3&=&\pm 8, \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{lll}x+4-t/3&=&\pm 8 \\ x+4+t/3&=&\pm 2. \end{array}
Since x(x+8) \geq 0, an easy check shows that x=1, and for this value we get y=1. Therefore, all the integer solutions are (0,0), (1,1), (-8,10), (10,-8).

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 5 - Problem J281

Problem:
Solve the equation x+\sqrt{(x+1)(x+2)}+\sqrt{(x+2)(x+3)}+\sqrt{(x+3)(x+1)}=4.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
We rewrite the equation in the form \sqrt{(x+1)(x+2)}+\sqrt{(x+2)(x+3)}=4-x-\sqrt{(x+3)(x+1)}.
Since 4-x \geq \sqrt{(x+3)(x+1)}, it follows that x \leq 13/12. Squaring both sides and reordering, we obtain
12\sqrt{(x+3)(x+1)}=-12x+11, from which x \leq 11/12. Squaring both sides again, we get
144x^2+576x+432=144x^2-264x+121, which gives x=-\dfrac{311}{840}.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 5 - Problem J280

Problem:
Let a, b, c, d be positive real numbers. Prove that
2(ab + cd)(ac + bd)(ad + bc) \geq (abc+bcd+cda+dab)^2.

Proposed by Ivan Borsenco.

Solution:
The given inequality is equivalent to the inequality \sum_{cyc} (abc)^2 \geq 2abcd\left(\sum_{cyc} (ab-a^2)+ac+bd \right).
Using the Rearrangement Inequality and the AM-GM Inequality, we get
\begin{array}{lll} \displaystyle 2abcd\left(\sum_{cyc} (ab-a^2)+ac+bd \right) & \leq & 2abcd(ac+bd)\\&=&(ac)^2 \cdot 2bd+ (bd)^2\cdot 2ac \\ & \leq & \displaystyle \sum_{cyc} (abc)^2, \end{array} and the conclusion follows.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 5 - Problem J279

Problem:
Find all triples (p, q, r) of primes such that pqr = p + q + r + 2000.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
Assume without loss of generality that p \leq q \leq r. The given equality can be rewritten as
\begin{equation}\label{first-eq} (rq-1)(p-1)+(r-1)(q-1)=2002.                 (1) \end{equation}
If p is an odd prime, then q and r are odd prime also, but this means that the LHS is divisible by 4 and the RHS is not divisible by 4, a contradiction. Thus, p=2 and equation (1) becomes (2q-1)(2r-1)=4005=3^2\cdot5\cdot89. Since 2q-1 \leq 2r-1, then (2q-1)^2 \leq 4005, i.e. 2q-1 \leq 63. This means that 2q-1 \in \{1,3,5,9,15,45\}. Clearly, 2q-1 \neq 1,15, therefore we have the four systems of equations
\begin{array}{lll} 2q-1&=&3 \\ 2r-1&=&1335, \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{lll} 2q-1&=&5 \\ 2r-1&=&801, \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{lll} 2q-1&=&9 \\ 2r-1&=&445, \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{lll} 2q-1&=&45 \\ 2r-1&=&89. \end{array}
It's easy to see that the first and the last system have no solution in primes, and the other two systems give q=3, r=401 and q=5, r=223. Therefore, (2,3,401) and (2,5,223) are two solutions to the given problem and by symmetry all the solutions are (2,3,401),(2,401,3),(3,2,401),(3,401,2),(401,2,3),(401,3,2), (2,5,223),(2,223,5),(5,2,223),(5,223,2),(223,2,5),(223,5,2).

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 5 - Problem J278

Problem:
Find all positive integers n for which \{\sqrt[3]{n}\} \leq \dfrac{1}{n}, where \{x\} denotes the fractional part of x.

Proposed by Ivan Borsenco.

Solution:
Clearly, every perfect cube satisfies the condition. Now, let m \in \mathbb{Z}^+ such that m^3<n<(m+1)^3, i.e. n=m^3+k with 1 \leq k \leq (m+1)^3-1. Then, \{\sqrt[3]{m^3+k}\} \geq \{\sqrt[3]{m^3+1}\}=\sqrt[3]{m^3+1}-m>\dfrac{1}{m^3+1}, for all m>2. Therefore, it's enough to find the integers which satisfy the condition in (1,8) \cup (8,27). An easy check shows that the required integers are n=2,9. In conclusion, n=2,9 or n=m^3 for some m \in \mathbb{Z}^+.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 5 - Problem J277

Problem:
Is there an integer n such that 4^{5^n}+ 5^{4^n} is a prime?

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.


Solution:
The answer is no. Clearly, for n<0 the given expression is not an integer. If n=0 we get 4+5=9, which is not a prime. If n>0, set x=5^{4^{n-1}} and y=4^{\frac{5^n-1}{4}}. It is easy to see that x and y are both integers. Hence 4^{5^n}+5^{4^n}=x^4+4y^4=(x^2+2y^2+2xy)(x^2+2y^2-2xy), which is the product of two positive integers greater than 1.

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 4 - Problem S273

Problem:
Let a,b,c be positive integers such that a \geq b \geq c and \dfrac{a-c}{2} is a prime. Prove that if a^2+b^2+c^2-2(ab+bc+ca)=b, then b is either a prime or a perfect square.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
From the given conditions, we have a=2p+c, where p is a prime number. Then, the given equation can be written as (2p-b)^2=b(4c+1). Expanding (2p-b)^2, we see that b|4p^2, therefore b \in \{1,2,4,p,2p,4p,p^2,2p^2,4p^2\}. We have three cases.

(i) b=2^{\alpha}, where \alpha \in \{0,1,2\}. If \alpha=0, then b=c=1, but this implies (2p-1)^2=5, a contradiction. If \alpha>0, then 2^{2-\alpha}(p-2^{\alpha-1})^2=(4c+1). If \alpha=1 we have a contradiciton. If \alpha=2, then (2p-1)^2=4c+1 and since c \in \{0,1,2,3\}, we obtain c=2 and p=2, which gives a=6. Therefore, a=6, \qquad b=4, \qquad c=2.

(ii) b=2^{\alpha}p, where \alpha \in \{0,1,2\}. If \alpha=0, then p=4c+1, and for all primes of the form 4k+1, with k \in \mathbb{Z}^+, we have c=(p-1)/4. Therefore, a=(9p-1)/4, \qquad b=p, \qquad c=(p-1)/4. If \alpha=1 we get an easy contradiction, and if \alpha=2, we get c=(p-1)/4, but this implies a=(9p-1)/4<4p=b, contradiction.

(iii) b=2^{\alpha}p^2, where \alpha \in \{0,1,2\}. If \alpha=0, then (2-p)^2=4c+1, which gives c=\dfrac{(p-1)(p-3)}{4} (note that this is an integer for all primes p>3) and a=\dfrac{(p+1)(p+3)}{4}<p^2=b a contradiction. If \alpha=1 we get an easy contradiction, and if \alpha=2, we get c=p(p-1) and a=p(p+1)<4p^2=b, a contradiction.

In conclusion, b \in \{4,p\}, hence b is either a prime or a perfect square.  

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 4 - Problem J276

Problem:
Find all positive integers m and n such that 10^n-6^m=4n^2

Proposed by Tigran Akopyan.

Solution:
It is easy to see that if n=1, then m=1 and (1,1) is a solution to the given equation. We prove that this is the only solution. Assume that n>1 and n odd. Then, 10^n-6^m \equiv -6^m \pmod{8} and 4n^2 \equiv 4 \pmod{8} and it is clear that -6^m \equiv 4 \pmod{8} if and only if m=2. But 10^n>36+4n^2 for all positive integers n>1, therefore there are no solutions when n is odd. Let n be an even number, i.e. n=2k for some k \in \mathbb{Z}^+. Hence,
(10^k-4k)(10^k+4k)=6^m. Since there are no solutions for k=1,2, let us assume that k>2. Clearly m \geq 4 and simplifying by 2, we get
\begin{equation} (2^{k-2}\cdot5^k - k)(2^{k-2}\cdot5^k + k)=2^{m-4}\cdot3^m.                          (1) \end{equation}
If k is odd, then m=4. But 2^{k-2}\cdot5^k + k \geq 2\cdot5^3+3 > 3^4, contradiction. Therefore, k must be even. Assume that k=2^{\alpha}h, where \alpha,h \in \mathbb{Z}^+ and h is odd. If \alpha \geq k-2, then 2^{k-2} | k, which implies that 2^{k-2} \leq k. This gives k=3,4 and an easy check shows that there are no solutions for this values. If \alpha < k-2, then equation (1) becomes 2^{2\alpha}(2^{k-2-\alpha}\cdot5^k - h)(2^{k-2-\alpha}\cdot5^k + h)=2^{m-4}\cdot3^m, and by unique factorizaton we have 2\alpha=m-4. Therefore, from the inequality k>\alpha+2, we obtain n>2\alpha+4=m. But this implies that 10^n=6^m+4n^2<6^n+4n^2, which is false for all integers n>1. Hence, there are no solutions for n even and the statement follows.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 4 - Problem J274

Problem:
Let p be a prime and let k be a nonnegative integer. Find all positive integer solutions (x, y, z) to the
equation x^k(y-z)+y^k(z-x)+z^k(x-y)=p.


Proposed by Alessandro Ventullo.

Solution:
It's easy to see that if k=0,1, the equation has no solution. Suppose that k \geq 2 and put f(x)=x^k(y-z)+y^k(z-x)+z^k(x-y). Since f(y)=0, then (x-y)|f(x) and since the expression is cyclic, we obtain that also (y-z) and (z-x) divide f(x), so x^k(y-z)+y^k(z-x)+z^k(x-y)=(x-y)(y-z)(z-x)h(x,y,z), \qquad h \in \mathbb{Z}[x,y,z].
Put x-y=a,y-z=b,z-x=c. Let p>2. Then a,b,c \in \{\pm 1, \pm p\} and a+b+c=0, but this is impossibile since a,b,c are all odd. Now, let p=2. Then a,b,c \in \{\pm 1, \pm 2\}. It is clear that a,b,c cannot all be equal (otherwise a=b=c=0) and cannot all be distinct (otherwise a+b+c\neq 0). Suppose a \geq b \geq c. We have two cases.

(i) a=b=1, c=-2. This implies that x,y,z are three consecutive integers, x>y>z. If y=n>1, where n \in \mathbb{Z}, the equation becomes
(n+1)^k-2n^k+(n-1)^k=2. If k=2, we get an identity, so there are infinitely many positive integer solutions (n+1,n,n-1). If k>2, then we have (n+1)^k+(n-1)^k > 2n^k+k(k-1)n^{k-2}>2n^k+2, so the equation has no solution.

(ii) a=2, b=c=-1, so x,y,z are three consecutive integers, x>z>y. If z=n>1, the equation becomes
-(n+1)^k-(n-1)^k+2n^k=2, which gives (n+1)^k+(n-1)^k=2(n^k-1)<2n^k, contradiction.

In conclusion, the equation has never positive integer solutions (x,y,z) if p>3 or p=2, k>2, and has infinitely many positive integer solution if p=k=2, namely (n+1,n,n-1), (n,n-1,n+1), (n-1,n+1,n), \qquad n>1. 

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 4 - Problem J273

Problem:
Let a,b,c be real numbers greater than or equal to 1. Prove that
\dfrac{a^3+2}{b^2-b+1}+\dfrac{b^3+2}{c^2-c+1}+\dfrac{c^3+2}{a^2-a+1} \geq 9.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
By the AM-GM Inequality, we have
\dfrac{a^3+2}{b^2-b+1}+\dfrac{b^3+2}{c^2-c+1}+\dfrac{c^3+2}{a^2-a+1} \geq 3\sqrt[3]{\left(\dfrac{a^3+2}{a^2-a+1}\right)\left( \dfrac{b^3+2}{b^2-b+1}\right)\left(\dfrac{c^3+2}{c^2-c+1}\right)}.
Since x^3+2=(x-1)^3+3(x^2-x+1), we have \dfrac{x^3+2}{x^2-x+1}=\dfrac{(x-1)^3}{x^2-x+1}+3\geq 3 for all x \geq 1.
Therefore,
\dfrac{a^3+2}{b^2-b+1}+\dfrac{b^3+2}{c^2-c+1}+\dfrac{c^3+2}{a^2-a+1} \geq 9.

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 3 - Problem S267

Problem:
Find all primes p,q,r such that 7p^3-q^3=r^6.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
Suppose that r=2. Then, 7p^3=(q+4)(q^2-4q+16). Observe that both p and q are odd primes. Since q^2-4q+16=(q+4)(q-8)+48, \gcd(q+4,q^2-4q+16)|48. Moreover, both factors are odd numbers, so \gcd(q+4,q^2-4q+16) \in \{1,3\}. If \gcd(q+4,q^2-4q+16)=3, then p=3 by Unique Factorization. Substituting these values into the original equation we get q=5. If \gcd(q+4,q^2-4q+16)=1, since both factors are greater than 1, we get p \neq 7 and \begin{array}{rcl} q+4&=&7 \\ q^2-4q+16&=&p^3 \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{rcl} q+4&=&p^3 \\ q^2-4q+16&=&7. \end{array} It's easy to see that both systems of equations have no solution. Now, suppose that r>2. Then, exactly one between p and q is 2 and the other is odd. Suppose that p=2. Then, 56=(q+r^2)(q^2-qr^2+r^4). Moreover both factors are greater than 1, q+r^2 is even and q^2-qr^2+r^4 is odd, so the only possibility is \begin{array}{rcl} q+r^2&=&8 \\ q^2-qr^2+r^4&=&7 \end{array} and clearly the first equation has no solution in odd primes. Now, suppose that q=2. Then, 7p^3=(r^2+2)(r^4-2r^2+4). Since
r^4-2r^2+4=(r^2+2)(r^2-4)+12, then \gcd(r^2+2,r^4-2r^2+4)|12, but both factors are odd, so \gcd(r^2+2,r^4-2r^2+4) \in \{1,3\}. If \gcd(r^2+2,r^4-2r^2+4)=3, then p=3 by Unique Factorization, but there is no solution for p=3,q=2. If \gcd(r^2+2,r^4-2r^2+4)=1, since both factors are greater than 1, we get p \neq 7 and \begin{array}{rcl} r^2+2&=&7 \\ r^4-2r^2+4&=&p^3 \end{array} \qquad \begin{array}{rcl} r^2+2&=&p^3 \\ r^4-2r^2+4&=&7. \end{array} It's easy to see that both systems of equations have no solution. Therefore, the only primes which satisfy the given equation are p=3,q=5,r=2.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 3 - Problem S265

Problem:
Find all pairs (m,n) of positive integers such that m^2 + 5n and n^2 + 5m are both perfect squares.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
Suppose that m=n. Then m^2+5m=m(m+5) must be a perfect square. Observe that \gcd(m,m+5)=1, otherwise \gcd(m,m+5)=5, which gives m=5k for some k \in \mathbb{N}^* and m+5=5(k+1), but m(m+5)=25k(k+1) cannot be a perfect square, since k and k+1 are coprimes and must be perfect squares. Therefore, m and m+5 are both perfect squares, and it's easy to see that this happens if and only if m=4.
Suppose without loss of generality that m>n. By an easy check, we can see that the only solution for m \leq 4 or n \leq 4 is m=n=4, so suppose that m>n>4. We have m^2<m^2+5n<(m+3)^2, so we obtain two cases.

(i) m^2+5n=(m+1)^2, which gives
\begin{equation} 5n=2m+1.                (1) \end{equation}
So, 6n>2m, i.e. 3n>m. Hence,
(n+3)^2<n^2+10n=n^2+4m+2<n^2+5m<n^2+15n<(n+8)^2.
We obtain four cases

(a) n^2+5m=(n+4)^2, i.e. 5m=8n+16, and summing up this equation with (1), we get 3(m-n)=17, contradiction. So, no solution in this case.
(b) n^2+5m=(n+5)^2, i.e. 5m=10n+25, which is m=2n+5. From equation (1) we get n=11 and m=27.
(c) n^2+5m=(n+6)^2, i.e. 5m=12n+36, which is 10m=24n+72. Multiplying by 5 equation (1), and summing up, we get n=77 and m=192.
(d) n^2+5m=(n+7)^2, i.e. 5m=14n+49, and summing up this equation with equation (1), we get 3(m-3n)=50, contradiction. So, no solution in this case.

(ii) m^2+5n=(m+2)^2, which gives
\begin{equation} 5n=4m+4.                (2) \end{equation}
So, 8n>4m, i.e. 2n>m. Hence,
(n+2)^2<n^2+5n<n^2+5m<n^2+10n<(n+5)^2.
We obtain two cases.

(a) n^2+5m=(n+3)^2, i.e. 5m=6n+9, which is 20m=24n+36. Multiplying by 5 equation (2), and summing up, we get n=56 and m=69.
(b) n^2+5m=(n+4)^2, i.e. 5m=8n+16, and summing up this equation with equation (2) we get m-3n=20, but m-3n<0, contradiction. So, no solution in this case.

In conclusion, all the pairs (m,n) which satisfy the required conditions are
(4,4),(11,27),(27,11),(77,192),(192,77),(56,69),(69,56).

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 3 - Problem J269

Problem:
Solve in positive integers the equation (x^2-y^2)^2-6\min(x,y)=2013.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
Clearly, x \neq y. Suppose without loss of generality that x<y. Then, 2013+6x=(x-y)^2(x+y)^2>(x+y)^2>4x^2, which gives 4x^2-6x-2013<0. Hence, 0<x<23. Moreover, (x^2-y^2)^2=3(671+2x), therefore 671+2x must be divisible by 3 since the left member is a perfect square. This implies that x=3k+2 for some k \in \mathbb{N}, so (x^2-y^2)^2=9(225+2k), and 225+2k must be a perfect square. If k=0 it's obvious. The least positive integer such that 225+2k is a square is k=32, but for this value we get x=98>23. Therefore k=0, x=2 and (x^2-y^2)^2=2025=45^2 which gives y^2-x^2=45, i.e. y=7. By symmetry, x=7,y=2 is another solution of the equation. So, all the positive integer solutions of the given equation are (2,7),(7,2).

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 3 - Problem J265

Problem:
Let a,b,c be real numbers such that 5(a+b+c)-2(ab+bc+ca)=9.
Prove that any two of the equalities |3a-4b|=|5c-6|, \qquad |3b-4c|=|5a-6|, \qquad |3c-4a|=|5b-6|
imply the third.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
By symmetry, we can suppose that the first two equalities are given. Since |x|=|y| if and only if x^2=y^2 for real numbers x,y, then
9a^2-24ab+16b^2=25c^2-60c+36, \qquad 9b^2-24bc+16c^2=25a^2-60a+36. Summing up the two equalities and reordering, we have
25b^2-24(ab+bc)+36=16a^2-60(a+c)+9c^2+108.
Since 60(a+c)-24(ab+bc)=108-60b+24ca, we get 25b^2+(108-60b+24ca)+36=16a^2+9c^2+108, and reordering we get (5b-6)^2=(3c-4a)^2, i.e. |5b-6|=|3c-4a|, which is the third equality.

Friday, May 24, 2013

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 2 - Problem U259

Problem:
Compute \lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{\left(1+\frac{1}{n(n+a)}\right)^{n^3}}{\left(1+\frac{1}{n+b}\right)^{n^2}}.

Proposed by Arkady Alt.


Solution:
We have \lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{\left(1+\frac{1}{n(n+a)}\right)^{n^3}}{\left(1+\frac{1}{n+b}\right)^{n^2}}= \dfrac{\lim_{n \to \infty} \left(1+\frac{1}{n(n+a)}\right)^{n^3}}{\lim_{n \to \infty} \left(1+\frac{1}{n+b}\right)^{n^2}}.
Since \left(1+\frac{1}{n(n+a)}\right)^{n^3}=e^{n^3 \log \left(1+\frac{1}{n(n+a)}\right)} \sim e^n as n \to \infty and \left(1+\frac{1}{n+b}\right)^{n^2}=e^{n^2 \log \left(1+\frac{1}{n+b}\right)} \sim e^n as n \to \infty, we have
\lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{\left(1+\frac{1}{n(n+a)}\right)^{n^3}}{\left(1+\frac{1}{n+b}\right)^{n^2}} \sim \dfrac{e^n}{e^n}=1.





Note: the official problem was modified lately.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 2 - Problem S259

Problem:
Let a,b,c,d,e be integers such that a(b+c)+b(c+d)+c(d+e)+d(e+a)+e(a+b)=0. Prove that a+b+c+d+e divides
a^5 + b^5 + c^5 + d^5 + e^5 - 5abcde.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.


Solution:
Suppose that a,b,c,d,e are the five roots \alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3,\alpha_4,\alpha_5 of a fifth degree polynomial P(x).
Let \sigma_k=\sum_{i=1}^5 \alpha^k_i, \qquad s_k=\sum_{1 \leq j_1 < j_2 < \ldots < j_k \leq 5} \alpha_{j_1}\alpha_{j_2}\cdots\alpha_{j_k}. With this notation, we know that s_2=0 and we want to prove that \sigma_1 divides \sigma_5-5s_5. We have P(x)=x^5-s_1x^4+s_2x^3-s_3x^2+s_4x-s_5, so
\begin{array}{lcl} P(\alpha_1)&=&\alpha^5_1-s_1\alpha^4_1+s_2\alpha^3_1-s_3\alpha^2_1+s_4\alpha_1-s_5=0 \\ P(\alpha_2)&=&\alpha^5_2-s_1\alpha^4_2+s_2\alpha^3_2-s_3\alpha^2_2+s_4\alpha_2-s_5=0 \\ P(\alpha_3)&=&\alpha^5_3-s_1\alpha^4_3+s_2\alpha^3_3-s_3\alpha^2_3+s_4\alpha_3-s_5=0 \\ P(\alpha_4)&=&\alpha^5_4-s_1\alpha^4_4+s_2\alpha^3_4-s_3\alpha^2_4+s_4\alpha_4-s_5=0 \\ P(\alpha_5)&=&\alpha^5_5-s_1\alpha^4_5+s_2\alpha^3_5-s_3\alpha^2_5+s_4\alpha_5-s_5=0. \end{array}
Summing up the columns, we get \sigma_5-s_1\sigma_4+s_2\sigma_3-s_3\sigma_2+s_4\sigma_1-5s_5=0. Since s_1=\sigma_1, s_2=0 and \sigma_2=\sigma^2_1-2s_2=\sigma^2_1 we obtatin \sigma_5-5s_5=\sigma_1(\sigma_4+s_3\sigma_1-s_4), hence \sigma_1|(\sigma_5-5s_5).

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 2 - Problem J263

Problem:
The n-th pentagonal number is given by the formula p_n = \dfrac{n(3n-1)}{2}. Prove that there are infinitely many pentagonal numbers that can be written as a sum of two perfect squares of positive integers.

Proposed by Jose Hernandez Santiago.


Solution:
We have p_n=n^2+\dfrac{(n-1)n}{2}=n^2+T_{n-1}, where T_{n-1} is the (n-1)-th triangular number. So, it is sufficient to prove that there are infinitely many triangular numbers which are perfect squares. Suppose that \dfrac{n(n+1)}{2}=m^2, \qquad m \in \mathbb{N}. This equation is equivalent to (2n+1)^2-8m^2=1 and putting x=2n+1, y=2m we have the Pell's equation x^2-2y^2=1, which has infinitely many solutions x=P_{2k}+P_{2k-1}, y=P_{2k}, where P_k=\dfrac{(1+\sqrt{2})^k-(1-\sqrt{2})^k}{2\sqrt{2}} is the k-th Pell number. Therefore, there are infinitely many triangular numbers m=P_{2k}/2 which are perfect squares and we are done.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 2 - Problem J262

Problem:
Find all positive integers m, n such that {m+1 \choose n}={n \choose m+1}.

Proposed by Roberto Bosch Cabrera.


Solution:
If m+1 \geq n, we have {m+1 \choose n}>0. If n<m+1, then {n \choose m+1}=0, so n \geq m+1, i.e. n=m+1.
If m+1 < n, then {m+1 \choose n}=0, so it must be {n \choose m+1}=0, which gives n < m+1, a contradiction. Hence all positive integers which satisfies the given equation are the consecutive positive integers m,m+1.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 2 - Problem J260

Problem:
Solve in integers the equation x^4-y^3=111.

Proposed by Jos e Hern andez Santiago.

Solution:
We claim that the equation has no integer solution. As a matter of fact, suppose that the given equation has an integer solution. Let us consider the equation modulo 13. Since x^2 \equiv 0,\pm 1, \pm 3, \pm 4 \pmod{13}, then x^4 \equiv 0,1,3,-4 \pmod{13}. Moreover y^3 \equiv 0, \pm 1, \pm 5 \pmod{13}. Hence, x^4-y^3 \equiv 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, \pm 3,\pm 4, \pm5, 6 \pmod{13}, but 111 \equiv -6 \pmod{13}, a contradiction.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 2 - Problem J259

Problem:
Among all triples of real numbers (x,y,z) which lie on a unit sphere x^2+y^2+z^2=1 find a triple which maximizes
\min (|x-y|, |y-z|, |z-x|).

Proposed by Arkady Alt.

Solution:
Suppose without loss of generality that \min (|x-y|, |y-z|, |z-x|)=|x-y|. Let f(x,y,z)=|x-y| and g(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2-1. Consider the Lagrangian function \begin{array}{lll} L(x,y,z,\lambda)&=&f(x,y,z)-\lambda g(x,y,z)\\&=&|x-y|- \lambda(x^2+y^2+z^2-1), \end{array} with \lambda \in \mathbb{R}. By Lagrange Multipliers Theorem, a maximum or a minimum for f(x,y,z) subject to the constraint g(x,y,z)=0 must be a stationary point of L. Therefore a maximum or a minimum satisfies
\begin{array}{rcl} \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial x} & = & 0 \\ \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial y} & = & 0 \\  \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial z} & = & 0 \\ \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial \lambda} & = & 0, \end{array} i.e. \begin{array}{rcl} \pm 1 - 2\lambda x & = & 0 \\ \mp 1 - 2\lambda y & = & 0 \\ -2\lambda z & = & 0 \\ x^2+y^2+z^2-1 & = & 0. \end{array} From the third equation we get z=0 since \lambda=0 would give a contradiction in the first two equations. From the first two equations we have x=\pm 1/2\lambda, y=\mp 1/2\lambda and substituting these values into the fourth equation we get \lambda=\pm \sqrt{2}/2, so x=\pm \sqrt{2}/2, y=\mp \sqrt{2}/2, z=0 are two stationary points which satisfies the conditions. It's easy to see that these two triples maximize f(x,y,z) since a minimum for f subject to the constraint g is 0 (take x=y=0, z=1). By symmetry we find that all triples which maximize \min (|x-y|, |y-z|, |z-x|) are (\pm \sqrt{2}/2, \mp \sqrt{2}/2, 0), (\pm \sqrt{2}/2, 0, \mp \sqrt{2}/2), (0, \pm \sqrt{2}/2, \mp \sqrt{2}/2), and \max (\min (|x-y|, |y-z|, |z-x|))=\sqrt{2}.

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 1 - Problem U257

Problem:
a) Let p and q be distinct primes and let G be a non-commutative group with pq elements. Prove that the center of G is trivial.

b) Let p, q, r be pairwise distinct primes and let G be a non-commutative group with
pqr elements. Prove that the number of elements of the center of G is either 1 or a prime number.

Proposed by Mihai Piticari.


Solution:
We use the following

Lemma
If G is a non-abelian group, then G/Z(G) is not a cyclic group.

Proof
Homework!

a) Since Z(G) is a subgroup of G, |Z(G)| divides |G|, which means  |Z(G)| \in \{1,p,q,pq\}. Therefore, |G/Z(G)| \in \{pq,q,p,1\} and since G/Z(G) cannot be cyclic, it must be |G/Z(G)|=pq, i.e. Z(G) is trivial.

b) As above, |G/Z(G)| is a divisor of G, so, |G/Z(G)| \in \{1,p,q,r,pq,qr,rp,pqr\}. Since G/Z(G) cannot be cyclic, the only possibilities are |G/Z(G)| \in \{pq,qr,rp,pqr\}, which means that |Z(G)| is either 1 or a prime number.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 1 - Problem U255

Problem:
Let S_n be the group of permutations of \{1,2,\ldots,n\}. If d > 1 is an integer, let H_d be the set of those \sigma \in S_n for which there are k \geq 1 and \sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_k \in S_n with \sigma = \sigma_1^d \cdots \sigma_k^d. Find H_2 and H_3.

Proposed by Mihai Piticari and Sorin Radulescu.

Solution:
If n=1,2, clearly H_2=H_3=S_n. Let n \geq 3. We first prove that H_d is a group for every integer d > 1. Indeed, if \sigma, \tau \in H_d, clearly \sigma \tau \in H_d. The associative property follows from the associativite property of the product of permutations. Moreover, \textrm{id} \in S_n and \textrm{id} = \textrm{id}^d, so \textrm{id} \in H_d for every d > 1. Finally if \sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_k \in H_d and \sigma=\sigma_1^d \cdots \sigma_k^d for some k \geq 1, we have that \sigma_1^{-1},\ldots,\sigma_k^{-1} \in S_n and \tau=(\sigma_k^{-1})^d\cdots(\sigma_1^{-1})^d is the inverse of \sigma. Now, let d=2. It is clear that H_2 is a subgroup of A_n since every permutation in H_2 is a product of even permutations and so is an even permutation. For every a_1,a_2,a_3 \in \{1,\ldots,n\}, we have also that (a_1, a_2, a_3)=(a_1, a_3, a_2)^2 so every 3-cycle belongs to H_2. Since A_n is generated by its 3-cycles, it follows that A_n is a subgroup of H_2, from which H_2=A_n. Now, let d=3. Obviously, H_3 is a subgroup of S_n. Moreover, for every a_1,a_2 \in \{1,\ldots,n\} we have (a_1,a_2)=(a_1,a_2)^3, so every 2-cycle belongs to H_3. Since S_n is generated by its 2-cycles, it follows that S_n is a subgroup of H_3, which gives H_3=S_n.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 1 - Problem U253

Problem:
Evaluate \sum_{n>1} \dfrac{3n^2+1}{(n^3-n)^3}.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
We observe that \dfrac{3n^2+1}{(n^3-n)^3}=\dfrac{1}{2}\left(\dfrac{1}{n^3(n-1)^3}-\dfrac{1}{(n+1)^3n^3}\right).
Hence, \begin{array}{lcl}\displaystyle \sum_{n=2}^\infty \dfrac{3n^2+1}{(n^3-n)^3}&=& \displaystyle \dfrac{1}{2} \sum_{n=2}^\infty \left(\dfrac{1}{n^3(n-1)^3}-\dfrac{1}{(n+1)^3n^3}\right)\\ &=& \displaystyle \dfrac{1}{2} \lim_{n \to \infty} \left(\dfrac{1}{8}-\dfrac{1}{(n+1)^3n^3}\right)\\&=& \dfrac{1}{16}. \end{array}

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 1 - Problem S255

Problem:
Solve in real numbers the equation 2^x+2^{-x}+3^x+3^{-x}+\left(\dfrac{2}{3}\right)^x+\left(\dfrac{2}{3}\right)^{-x}=9x^4-7x^2+6.

Proposed by Mihaly Bencze.

Solution:
We rewrite the equation in the form \left(2^{x/2}-2^{-x/2}\right)^2+\left(3^{x/2}-3^{-x/2}\right)^2+\left((2/3)^{x/2}-(2/3)^{-x/2}\right)^2=9x^4-7x^2. Let f(x)=\left(2^{x/2}-2^{-x/2}\right)^2+\left(3^{x/2}-3^{-x/2}\right)^2+\left((2/3)^{x/2}-(2/3)^{-x/2}\right)^2 and g(x)=9x^4-7x^2. Since f(x) and g(x) are even functions, it suffices to find the solutions when x \geq 0. It is easy to see that x=0 and x=1 are solutions of the given equation. Moreover, f(x) is increasing for x \geq 0 since it is a sum of increasing functions, and g(x) is increasing if x \geq \sqrt{7/18} and decreasing if 0 \leq x \leq \sqrt{7/18}, as can be seen from g'(x). Since f(x) and g(x) are both injective functions if x \geq 1, then h(x)=g(x)-f(x) is an injective function if x \geq 1, so h(1)=0 and h(x) \neq 0 for all x>1. Therefore the equation has no other solutions for x \geq 0, which means that the only solutions of the equation are x=-1,0,1.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 1 - Problem S253

Problem:
Solve in positive real numbers the system of equations:
\begin{array}{rcl}(2x)^{2013}+(2y)^{2013}+(2z)^{2013} & = & 3 \\ xy+yz+zx+2xyz & = & 1 \end{array}

Proposed by Roberto Bosch Cabrera.

Solution:
Let 2x=a, 2y=b, 2z=c. Then, the given system of equations is equivalent to
\begin{array}{rcl}a^{2013}+b^{2013}+c^{2013} & = & 3 \\ ab+bc+ca+abc & = & 4. \end{array} Using the AM-GM Inequality in the first equation, we get abc \leq 1 and from the second equation we get ab+bc+ca \geq 3. Suppose without loss of generality that a \leq b \leq c. By Chebyshev's Inequality, we have
\begin{equation} 1 \leq \dfrac{ab+bc+ca}{3} \leq \dfrac{(a+b+c)^2}{9},                           (1) \end{equation}
therefore a+b+c \geq 3. Using Chebyshev's Inequality once again, we have \dfrac{a^{n-1}+b^{n-1}+c^{n-1}}{3} \leq \left(\dfrac{a+b+c}{3}\right)\left(\dfrac{a^{n-1}+b^{n-1}+c^{n-1}}{3}\right) \leq \dfrac{a^n+b^n+c^n}{3} for all n \in \mathbb{N}^*. Since \dfrac{a^{2013}+b^{2013}+c^{2013}}{3}=1, we get a^n+b^n+c^n \leq 3 for all positive integers n < 2013, and in particular a+b+c \leq 3. This gives a+b+c=3, and from (1) we get ab+bc+ca=3, which implies abc=1. Therefore, a+b+c=3\sqrt[3]{abc}, so a=b=c=1, i.e. x=y=z=1/2 is the only solution to the given system of equations.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 1 - Problem J256

Problem:
Evaluate 1^2 2!+2^2 3! + \ldots + n^2(n+1)!.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
We have \begin{array}{lcl} k^2(k+1)! & = & [(k^2+k-2)-(k-2)](k+1)!\\ & = & [(k-1)(k+2)-(k-2)](k+1)!\\ & = &(k-1)(k+2)!-(k-2)(k+1)! \end{array} for all k \in \mathbb{N}. Therefore, 1^2 2!+2^2 3! + \ldots + n^2(n+1)!=(n-1)(n+2)!+2.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 1 - Problem J254

Problem:
Solve the following equation F_{a_1} + F_{a_2} + \ldots + F_{a_k} = F_{a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_k} , where F_i is the i-th
Fibonacci number.


Proposed by Roberto Bosch Cabrera.

Solution:
If k=1 the equation has infinitely many solutions. Let k \geq 2 and suppose that 1 \leq a_1 \leq a_2 \leq \ldots \leq a_k.
We have five cases.

(i) k=2. Suppose that a_1+a_2 \leq 4. It's easy to see that (1,2) and (1,3) are solutions. Now, suppose that a_1+a_2 \geq 5. If a_1=1, then a_2 \geq 4 and F_{a_1+a_2-2}>F_{a_1}. If a_1>1, then a_2>2, so F_{a_1+a_2-1}>F_{a_2} and F_{a_1+a_2}=F_{a_1+a_2-1}+F_{a_1+a_2-2} > F_{a_2}+F_{a_1}, i.e. the equation has no solution if a_1+a_2 \geq 5.

(ii) k=3. There are no solutions when a_3=1. If a_3=2, we have the solution (1,1,2). It's easy to see that there are no more solutions such that a_2=1 and a_3>2. Suppose that a_3 \geq 2 and a_2 \geq 2. If a_3=2, we get F_{a_1+a_2+a_3-1}>F_{a_3} and if a_3>2, we get F_{a_1+a_2+a_3-2}>F_{a_1+a_2}, so F_{a_1+a_2+a_3}=F_{a_1+a_2+a_3-1}+F_{a_1+a_2+a_3-2}>F_{a_3}+F_{a_1+a_2} \geq F_{a_3}+F_{a_2}+F_{a_1}, i.e. no solution if a_3>2.

(iii) k=4. A simple check shows that there are no solutions if a_4=1. If a_4 \geq 2 and a_3=1 there are no solutions, and if a_3 \geq 2, we can argue similarly to the previous case and conclude that F_{a_1+a_2+a_3+a_4} > F_{a_4}+F_{a_1+a_2+a_3} \geq F_{a_4}+F_{a_3}+F_{a_2}+F_{a_1}, i.e. no solution in this case.

(iv) k=5. If a_5=1, we immediately see that (1,1,1,1,1) is a solution. If a_5 \geq 2 and a_4=1, there are no solutions and if a_4 \geq 2 we get F_{a_1+a_2+a_3+a_4+a_5}>F_{a_5}+F_{a_1+a_2+a_3+a_4}\geq F_{a_5}+F_{a_4}+F_{a_3}+F_{a_2}+F_{a_1}.

(v) k>5. Clearly, a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_k \geq k. If a_k=1, there are no solutions since a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_k=k and F_k>k. If a_k \geq 2 and a_{k-1}=1, then a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_{k-1}=k-1 and
\begin{array}{lcl} F_{a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_k}&=&F_{a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_k-1}+F_{a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_k-2}\\&>&F_{a_k}+F_{a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_{k-1}} =  F_{a_k}+F_{k-1} \\ & \geq & F_{a_k}+k-1 \\ & = & F_{a_k}+F_{a_{k-1}}+\ldots+F_{a_1}. \end{array}
If a_k \geq 2 and a_{k-1} \geq 2, we have
\begin{array}{lcl} F_{a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_k} & > & F_{a_k}+ F_{a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_{k-1}}\\ & > & F_{a_k}+F_{a_{k-1}} + F_{a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_{k-2}} \\ & \geq & F_{a_k}+F_{a_{k-1}}+F_{a_{k-2}}+F_{a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_{k-3}} \\ & \vdots & \vdots \\ & \geq & F_{a_k}+F_{a_{k-1}}+\ldots+F_{a_2}+F_{a_1}-1 , \end{array} which gives F_{a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_k} > F_{a_k}+F_{a_{k-1}}+\ldots+F_{a_2}+F_{a_1}, so there are no solutions in this case.

Mathematical Reflections 2013, Issue 1 - Problem J253

Problem:
Prove that if a,b,c>0 satisfy abc=1, then \dfrac{1}{ab+a+2}+\dfrac{1}{bc+b+2}+\dfrac{1}{ca+c+2} \leq \dfrac{3}{4}.

Proposed by Marcel Chirita.

Solution:
By the AM-HM Inequality, we have \dfrac{1}{ab+1+a+1} \leq \dfrac{1}{4}\left(\dfrac{1}{ab+1}+\dfrac{1}{a+1}\right)=\dfrac{1}{4}\left(\dfrac{c}{c+1}+\dfrac{1}{a+1}\right) \dfrac{1}{bc+1+b+1} \leq \dfrac{1}{4}\left(\dfrac{1}{bc+1}+\dfrac{1}{b+1}\right)=\dfrac{1}{4}\left(\dfrac{a}{a+1}+\dfrac{1}{b+1}\right) \dfrac{1}{ca+1+c+1} \leq \dfrac{1}{4}\left(\dfrac{1}{ca+1}+\dfrac{1}{c+1}\right)=\dfrac{1}{4}\left(\dfrac{b}{b+1}+\dfrac{1}{c+1}\right).
Summing up the three inequalities, we obtain \dfrac{1}{ab+a+2}+\dfrac{1}{bc+b+2}+\dfrac{1}{ca+c+2} \leq \dfrac{1}{4} \left( \dfrac{a+1}{a+1}+\dfrac{b+1}{b+1}+\dfrac{c+1}{c+1}\right)=\dfrac{3}{4}. 

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem O249

Problem:
Find all triples (x,y,z) of positive integers such that \dfrac{x}{y}+\dfrac{y}{z+1}+\dfrac{z}{x}=\dfrac{5}{2}.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
By the AM-GM Inequality it must be 3\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{z}{z+1}} \leq \dfrac{x}{y}+\dfrac{y}{z+1}+\dfrac{z}{x}=\dfrac{5}{2}, i.e. \dfrac{z}{z+1} \leq \dfrac{125}{216}, which gives z=1.
Using the AM-GM Inequality once again we obtain
2\sqrt{\dfrac{x}{2}} \leq \dfrac{x}{y}+\dfrac{y}{2}+\dfrac{1}{x}=\dfrac{5}{2},
i.e. \dfrac{x}{2} \leq \dfrac{25}{16}, which gives x=1,2,3.

(i) If x=1, then \dfrac{1}{y}+\dfrac{y}{2}+1=\dfrac{5}{2} and solving for y we get y=1,2.
(ii) If x=2, then \dfrac{2}{y}+\dfrac{y}{2}+\dfrac{1}{2}=\dfrac{5}{2} and solving for y we get y=2.
(iii) If x=3, then \dfrac{3}{y}+\dfrac{y}{2}+\dfrac{1}{3}=\dfrac{5}{2}, which gives no solution.

Therefore, all the triples of positive integers which satisfy the given equation are (1,1,1),(1,2,1),(2,2,1).

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem O247

Problem:
Solve in positive integers the equation xy+yz+zx-5\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}=1.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
Clearly, xy+yz+zx \geq 3. Rewriting the equation in the form (xy+yz+zx-1)^2=25(x^2+y^2+z^2), we put xy+yz+zx=5t+1, t > 0, so that x^2+y^2+z^2=t^2. Then (x+y+z)^2=x^2+y^2+z^2+2(xy+yz+zx)=t^2+2(5t+1)=(t+5)^2-23, which gives (t+5-x-y-z)(t+5+x+y+z)=23.
Since x,y,z,t are positive integers, it must be
\left\{\begin{array}{rcl} t+5-x-y-z & = & 1 \\ t+5+x+y+z & = & 23. \end{array} \right.
Summing up the two equations, we get t=7. So, x+y+z=11 and xy+yz+zx=36. Suppose without loss of generality that x \leq y \leq z. Clearly, x\leq3, so we have three cases.

(i) x=1. Therefore, y+z=10, yz=26, so there are no solution.
(ii) x=2. Therefore, y+z=9, yz=18, so y=3, z=6.
(iii) x=3. Therefore, y+z=8, yz=12, so there are no solution.

In conclusion, all the positive integer solutions are (2,3,6), (2,6,3), (3,2,6), (3,6,2), (6,2,3), (6,3,2).

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem U249

Problem:
Let (a_n)_{n \geq 1} be a decreasing sequence of positive numbers. Let s_n=a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_n, and b_n=\dfrac{1}{a_{n+1}}-\dfrac{1}{a_n}, for all n \geq 1. Prove that if (s_n)_{n \geq 1} is convergent, then (b_n)_{n \geq 1} is unbounded.

Proposed by Bogdan Enescu.

Solution:
Since (s_n)_{n \geq 1} is convergent, then \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n=0. Suppose that (b_n)_{n \geq 1} is bounded. Then there exists M \in \mathbb{R}^+ such that b_n \leq M for all n \geq 1. By the Problem 2.5.12 at page 97 of Radulescu, Andreescu - Problems In Real Analysis, the sequence (a_n)_{n \geq 1} converges to zero if and only if the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(1-a_{n+1}/a_n\right)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_{n+1}b_n diverges. But
\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_{n+1}b_n \leq \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_nb_n \leq M\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n < \infty, contradiction.

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem U247

Problem:
Let a be a real number greater than 1. Evaluate
\dfrac{1}{a^2-a+1}-\dfrac{2a}{a^4-a^2+1}+\dfrac{4a^3}{a^8-a^4+1}-\dfrac{8a^7}{a^{16}-a^{8}+1}+\ldots.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
Let S_n=\sum_{k=1}^n (-1)^{k-1}\dfrac{2^{k-1}a^{2^{k-1}-1}}{a^{2^k}-a^{2^{k-1}}+1}. Since
\begin{array}{rcr} \dfrac{1}{a^2-a+1}-\dfrac{1}{a^2+a+1}&=&\dfrac{2a}{a^4+a^2+1} \\  -\dfrac{2a}{a^4-a^2+1}+\dfrac{2a}{a^4+a^2+1}&=&-\dfrac{4a^3}{a^8+a^4+1} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\ (-1)^{n-1} \dfrac{2^{n-1}a^{2^{n-1}-1}}{a^{2^n}-a^{2^{n-1}}+1}+(-1)^n \dfrac{2^{n-1}a^{2^{n-1}-1}}{a^{2^n}+a^{2^{n-1}}+1} & = & (-1)^{n+1} \dfrac{2^na^{2^n-1}}{a^{2^{n+1}}+a^{2^n}+1}. \end{array}
summing up the two columns, we get S_n-\dfrac{1}{a^2+a+1}=(-1)^{n+1} \dfrac{2^na^{2^n-1}}{a^{2^{n+1}}+a^{2^n}+1}.
Now, 0 \leq \left|(-1)^{n+1}\dfrac{2^na^{2^n-1}}{a^{2^{n+1}}+a^{2^n}+1}\right| \leq \dfrac{2^na^{2^n}}{a^{2^{n+1}}}=\dfrac{2^n}{a^{2^n}} and  \dfrac{2^n}{a^{2^n}} \to 0 as n \to \infty. So,
\sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^{k-1}\dfrac{2^{k-1}a^{2^{k-1}-1}}{a^{2^k}-a^{2^{k-1}}+1}=\lim_{n \to \infty} S_n = \dfrac{1}{a^2+a+1}.

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem S251

Problem:
Find all triples (x,y,z) of positive real numbers for which there is a positive real number t such that the following inequalities hold simultaneously:
\dfrac{1}{x}+\dfrac{1}{y}+\dfrac{1}{z}+t\leq4, \qquad x^2+y^2+z^2+\dfrac{2}{t}\leq5.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
From the two inequalities, it's easy to see that if there exists such a positive real number t, then t satisfies
\begin{equation}\label{first} \dfrac{2}{5}<t<4.                                                              (1) \end{equation}
From the first inequality, using the AM-HM inequality we obtain \dfrac{9}{4-t} \leq \dfrac{9}{\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z}} \leq x+y+z.
Now, suppose without loss of generality that x \geq y \geq z. Then, x^2 \geq y^2 \geq z^2 and 1/x \leq 1/y \leq 1/z.
By Chebyshev's Inequality, we have x+y+z \leq \dfrac{\left(\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z}\right)(x^2+y^2+z^2)}{3} \leq \dfrac{(5-2/t)(4-t)}{3}. Hence, \dfrac{9}{4-t} \leq \dfrac{(5-2/t)(4-t)}{3} and after simple calculations we get
5t^3-42t^2+69t-32 \geq 0 \iff (t-1)^2(5t-32) \geq 0, which gives
\begin{equation}\label{second} t=1, \qquad t \geq \dfrac{32}{5}.                                       (2) \end{equation}
From (1) and (2), we get t=1, from which x+y+z=1/x+1/y+1/z=3. But this implies that the arithmetic mean and harmonic mean are equal, so x=y=z=1 and the only triple is (1,1,1).

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem S249

Problem:
Find the minimum of 2^x-4^x+6^x-8^x-9^x+12^x where x is a positive real number.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
We have \begin{array}{rcl}2^x-4^x+6^x-8^x-9^x+12^x&=&(4^x-3^x)(3^x-2^x)-[(4^x-3^x)+(3^x-2^x)]\\&=&(4^x-3^x-1)(3^x-2^x-1)-1. \end{array}
Let f_n(x)=(n+1)^x-n^x-1, where n is a positive integer. f_n(x) is increasing since
f'_n(x)=(n+1)^x\log(n+1)-n^x\log n > 0 \iff \left(1+\dfrac{1}{n}\right)^x>\dfrac{\log n}{\log (n+1)} for all x \in \mathbb{R}^+. Moreover f_n(1)=0, so f_n(x) \geq 0 if x \in [1,\infty) and f_n(x) \leq 0 if x \in (0,1], for all n \in \mathbb{N}^*. Therefore, f_3(x)f_2(x)-1 \geq -1 \qquad \forall x \in \mathbb{R}^+ and the equality occurs if and only if x=1.

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem S248

Problem:
Let \mathcal{C}(O,R) be a circle and let P be a point in its plane. Consider a pair of diametrically
opposite points A and B lying on \mathcal{C}. Prove that while points A and B vary on the
circumference of \mathcal{C}, the circumcircles of triangles ABP pass through another fixed point.

Proposed by Ivan Borsenco.

Solution:
Let us consider another pair of diametrically opposite points A' and B' on \mathcal{C}. Then, O is the midpoint of AB and A'B', so in the triangles ABP and A'B'P the points O and P are fixed, and this implies that the line PO is fixed. Therefore, the line PO intersects the circumcircle of the triangle A'B'P in another point Q, which is fixed. By the arbitrarity of the pair of diametrically opposite points A',B', we obtain that all the circumcircles of triangles ABP pass through the point Q.

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem S247

Problem:
Prove that for any positive integers m and n, the number 8m^6 + 27m^3n^3 + 27n^6 is
composite.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
For the homogeneity of the expression, we set t=m/n. Then,
\begin{array}{rcl} 8t^6+27t^3+27 &= & 8t^6-27t^3+27+54t^3\\ &=& (2t^2)^3+(-3t)^3+3^3-(2t^2)(-3t)(3)\\&=&(2t^2-3t+3)(4t^4+6t^3+3t^2+9t+9). \end{array} The second factor is clearly greater than 1 and 2t^2-3t+3=2(t-1)^2+t+1>1, so multiplying both sides of the equation by n^6 we obtain the conclusion.

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem J251

Problem:
Let a,b,c be positive real numbers such that a \geq b \geq c and b^2>ac. Prove that
\dfrac{1}{a^2-bc}+\dfrac{1}{b^2-ca}+\dfrac{1}{c^2-ab}>0.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
By AM-GM Inequality,
\dfrac{1}{a^2-bc}+\dfrac{1}{b^2-ca}+\dfrac{1}{c^2-ab} \geq \dfrac{3}{a^2+b^2+c^2-ab-bc-ca} > 0,
where the last inequality follows from the fact that a,b,c cannot all be equal.

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem J249

Problem:
Find the least prime p>3 that divides 3^q-4^q+1 for all primes q>3.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
Since 3^5-4^5+1=-780=-(2^2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot13), and 3^7-4^7+1 is not divisible by 5, we only have to show that p=13 divides 3^q-4^q+1 for all primes q>3. Since q is a prime, q=6k \pm 1 for some k \in \mathbb{N}^*. Moreover, 3^{6k} \equiv 1 \pmod{13} and 4^{6k} \equiv 1 \pmod{13}, then
\begin{array}{rrrrrr} 3^{6k+1}-4^{6k+1}+1 & \equiv & 3-4+1 \equiv & 0 & \pmod{13} \\ 3^{6k-1}-4^{6k-1}+1 & \equiv & 9-10+1 \equiv & 0 & \pmod{13}, \end{array}
which gives the conclusion.

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem J248

Problem:
Let f:[1,\infty) \longrightarrow \mathbb{R} be defined by f(x)=\dfrac{\{x\}^2}{\lfloor x \rfloor}. Prove that f(x+y) \leq f(x)+f(y), for any real numbers x and y.

Proposed by Sorin Radulescu.

Solution:
Since \{x+y\} \leq \{x\}+\{y\} and \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor y \rfloor \leq \lfloor x+y \rfloor for all x,y \in \mathbb{R}, using the well known inequality \dfrac{a^2}{x}+\dfrac{b^2}{y} \geq \dfrac{(a+b)^2}{x+y} \qquad \forall a,b,x,y \in \mathbb{R}, x,y>0 we have f(x+y)=\dfrac{\{x+y\}^2}{\lfloor x+y \rfloor} \leq \dfrac{(\{x\}+\{y\})^2}{\lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor y \rfloor} \leq \dfrac{\{x\}^2}{\lfloor x \rfloor} + \dfrac{\{y\}^2}{\lfloor y \rfloor}=f(x)+f(y) for all x,y \in [1,\infty).

Mathematical Reflections 2012, Issue 6 - Problem J247

Problem:
Let a and b be distinct zeros of the polynomial x^3-2x+c. Prove that a^2(2a^2+4ab+3b^2)=3 if and only if b^2(3a^2+4ab+2b^2)=5.

Proposed by Titu Andreescu.

Solution:
Let \alpha be the other root of the polynomial x^3-2x+c. Then \alpha^3-2\alpha+c=0 and a+b=-\alpha, \qquad ab=\alpha^2-2. Therefore, \begin{array}{rcl} a^2(2a^2+4ab+3b^2)+b^2(3a^2+4ab+2b^2) & = & 2(a+b)^2(a^2+b^2)+2a^2b^2 \\ & = & 2\alpha^2 [\alpha^2-2(\alpha^2-2)]+2(\alpha^2-2)^2 \\ &=& 2[\alpha^2-(\alpha^2-2)]^2 \\ &=& 8, \end{array} and the statement follows.